Child Care: Research Can Inform the Development of Public
Policy
Overview | Article
Summary | For Instructors | For
Students
Scarr, S. (1998). American child care today. American Psychologist,
53, 95-108.
Overview:
The Child Care Debate
Any situation in which a child is cared for by someone other than the
mother is referred to as day care, child care, babysitting, after-school
care, etc. Child care has traditionally served three purposes: (a) child
care allows mothers to work outside of the home, (b) child care can provide
high quality developmental experiences, and (c) child care can provide
health, education, and behavioral training services to economically disadvantaged,
immigrant, and/or at-risk children.
Child care is hotly debated. Are the many children in child care (surveys
indicate that at least 60% of children in the United States experience
some form of non-maternal care) receiving the best developmental experiences?
Is child care worth the expense? Sandra Scarr, a leading researcher in
child care, reviews research that addresses these issues and argues for
a strong public policy on child care.
Overview | Article Summary | For
Instructors | For Students
Article Summary
In her thorough review, Scarr (1998) examines child care from the perspectives
of the labor force, child development research, and public policy.
Child care is essential for working mothers. Scarr cites one study showing
that, in 1995, almost two-thirds of American mothers with children under
the age of six were employed. But income generated by maternal employment
is offset by child-care costs. Quality child care cost a lot of money and
low income families simply cannot afford the same quality of child care
that higher income families can. Another issue is ease of access; child
care must be accessible as well as affordable. Finally, child care must
be secure. When child care arrangements break down, productivity in the
labor force declines.
Although many studies have been conducted, developmental researchers
have been unable to determine whether child care is harmful or beneficial
to child development. Certainly children from disadvantaged or impoverished
environments have benefited from child care. But recent research, examining
quality of child care, family characteristics (such as income, education,
race, attitudes, stress), and child characteristics (such as age, gender,
previous child-care experiences) indicates that child care does not have
much of an impact -- positive or negative -- on children from relatively
ordinary homes.
According to Scarr, a two-tier system of child care is evolving in the
United States. High quality but expensive child care is available for higher
income families and for disadvantaged families (who receive public support).
Less expensive and lower quality child care is the only option available
to middle and lower income families. Scarr uses this argument to stress
the need for public policy on child care. She calls on governments to be
responsible for making child care affordable and ensuring that all children
receive high quality developmental experiences.
Overview | Article
Summary | For Instructors | For Students
For Instructors
Links to the Lecture
This is a good topic for a discussion of research issues. These studies
are all correlational and they are generally funded by people with a vested
interest in the outcome. How far can results from these studies be generalized?
Can cause and effect statements be made?
These are all slightly older videos but the issues are still very relevant:
- Infant Day Care Update (1987, University of Wisconsin, 11 min)
provides an excellent starting point for a discussion of psychological,
developmental, and research issues in child care.
- Problems of Working Women (1988, Films for the Humanities and
Sciences, 24 min). Discusses problems with inadequate care, low salaries
for women.
- Babies and child care (1986, National Association for the Education
of Young Children, 47 min). Child development specialist discusses the
needs of infants in child care settings.
Overview | Article
Summary | For Instructors | For Students
For Students
About the Authors
Sandra Scarr is a Professor of Psychology at the University of Virginia
and the C.E.O. of KinderCare,
the largest preschool and child care company in the United States.
About the Journal
This article came from a special issue of the American
Psychologist on the applications of developmental science to a
number of socially relevant issues, including topics such as child care,
child abuse, and adolescent pregnancy. Check out the summary of another
article from this same issue by Bruck,
Ceci, and Hembrooke (1998) dealing with the reliability and credibility
of young childrenÕs testimony.
Links to Life
Check out this wealth of resources on child
care and school-aged child care developed by the National
Network for Child Care.
Here are a series of reviewed
reports on child care posted by the National
Child Care Information Center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services. You can access full-length reports on research and
policy related to questions about the economics and benefits of child care.
|