By Jene on Monday, September 28, 1998 - 12:52 pm:
Summary re: TIPS
The group seemed to agree that the computer was not a good communicator. Someone commented that the dialogue was pretty linear, the computer did not listen and it never asks questions in return. Sometimes the responses did not make sense. As well, it was discussed that the computer could not pick up the nuances in questions, but rather concentrated on one keyword. For example, the question was asked “Should abortion be used as a form of birth control?.” The computer responded by talking about birth control, with no mention of abortion.
Conversation was defined as an exchange of ideas that involves taking the whole sentence into context and responding to it. Someone else mentioned that conversation involves comprehending what is said.
Chimpanzees’ capabilities for language were discussed, as was those of the horse Clever Hans. It was mentioned that neither the chimpanzees nor the horse were conversing because they were taught how to respond, rather than thinking of the words themselves. TIPS was also not conversing, because it simply picked up keywords in a person’s sentence and responded in a pre-programmed way. Someone commented that it would be very difficult to program a computer with all the grammatical nuances of a particular language, plus provide it with the tremendous number of responses a given question could elicit. One person brought up the interesting point that animal species can “converse” with their own species, but not with humans.
The question was asked if TIPS might have some form of aphasia. If it did, it would be some form of Broca’s aphasia, where there is difficulty understanding grammatically complex sentences.
By Patricia on Tuesday, September 29, 1998 - 12:29 pm:
Good, direct answers to the questions asked. You've also uncovered why TIPS is not able to communicate well (e.g.," it would be very difficult to program a computer with all the grammatical nuances of a particular language").I liked that you expanded your discussion and summary to situations that suggest other issues about conversation. A thought about the nature of computer "intelligence" would have been interesting (e.g., do computers "think"?)
Grade = +2