By Ivanka on Wednesday, November 4, 1998 - 11:44 am:
SUMMARY
Through our posts we discussed the importance of considering culture in personality testinng, recognizing cultural differences and the effect of biased questioning.
We talked about the questions on the VALS questionaire and how some seemed to be limiting in terms of interests and feelings. We also pointed out one particularilly culturally-biased question that 's purpose was to determine personality but did not take into consideration a common cultural norm of Arab people. This question was, "a woman's life can only be fulfilled if she can provide a happy home for her family".
We discussed laws, expectations, and culture in different parts of the world and how these differ. Some examples of different cultures that we talked about are Texas, the Middle East, Asia, and Tehran. Two oppinions were raised about the differences between Americans and Canadians. One was that because we share the same media coverage and entertainment we can't be that different. Another oppinion was that culture is distinguishable from stste to state and province to province and ultimately between the two countries. It was also mentioned that some cultural differences are more distinguishable than others and that a large amount of exposure to different societies is sometimes necessary to be able to pick these differences out.
It seemed to be an important consideration of the makers of the test to let us know that the results would not be valid if we are not US citizens. This fact could account for an off-base result.
We discussed the serious implications of culture-biased personality testing and came up with a fictional example of a man being suspected of his wife's murder. If this man's culture enforced the idea that women are secondayy citizens, this might reflect in a personality test and be held against him without taking his environmental influence into consideration.
By Patricia on Friday, November 6, 1998 - 02:01 pm:
Good discussion. The question you picked out to illustrate how particular culture may answer differently (ie. question on a woman's life) was a good choice. A little deeper discussion of your murder example would have added. I thought you just touched the surface of a really interesting issue. Still, this was a good contribution.
Grade = 2+