Research and Teaching Showcase 
 
 

Study Center Home 
Study Center Home 

Back to Research Showcase 
Back to Showcase Features 

Discussion Forums 
Discussion Forums 

Archives 
Archives 

  May 1998 -- and Social Psychology 

Warning: The Surgeon General May Be Bad For Your Health

Overview | Article Summary | For Instructors | For Students
 

Bushman, B.J. (1998). Effects of warning and information labels on consumption of full-fat, reduced-fat, and no-fat products. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 97-101. 

Overview:

Forbidden Fruit

Why do we do things that we know are bad for us? Why do we long to stick our hands in the cookie jar when we have been told to stay out of it? This phenomenon is even described in the Bible in the story of Adam and Eve and the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden. Social psychologists are very interested in understanding why people engage in behavior that they know is "bad" for them. 

Reactance theory attempts to account for why people want what they shouldn't have. According to reactance theory, people perceive being warned against something as a threat to freedom of behavior. This causes a psychological reactance - the person strongly desires to retain freedom of behavior. In order to retain a sense of freedom of behavior the person engages in the warned behavior. So, being told that smoking, drinking, or overeating is hazardous to our health has the opposite effect from what is desired - it causes us to want to smoke, drink, and eat more

Does a warning from an authoritative figure cause greater reactance than a simple warning? Bushman (1998) examined college students' preferences for different types of cream cheese based on a warning label from an authoritative source, an information warning label, and no label. 
 
 

Overview | Article Summary | For Instructors | For Students

Article Summary

We are bombarded with warning labels every day, on cigarettes, alcohol, food packages, television, the Web. These warning labels are meant to protect us as consumers. However, warning labels seem to have the opposite effect - they draw us toward the product rather than repel us from it. 

Bushman (1998) hypothesized that simple information labels may be more effective repellents than authoritative warning labels. He designed an experiment in which college students rated their preference for and engaged in taste tests of non-fat, reduced-fat, and full-fat cream cheeses. Students rated their preferences and tasted the cream cheese under one of three conditions: 

  • Warning label. The cream cheeses were labeled with "In this product, 90% (or 64% or 0% depending on the actual fat content) of the calories come from fat. Warning: The U. S. Surgeon General has determined that eating high fat food increases your risk of heart disease." 
  • Information label. The cream cheese were labeled with "In this product, 90% (or 64% or 0% depending on the actual fat content) of the calories come from fat." 
  • No label control
Bushman found that students in the warning label and no label conditions wanted to taste the high fat cream cheese more than students in the information label condition. Interestingly, however, when allowed to chose one cheese to taste, students in the warning and information label conditions were less likely to actually taste the high fat cream cheese than students in the no label condition. 

Bushman's results support reactance theory; students reading the Surgeon General warning labels wanted to taste the cream cheese more than students who simply read the fat content information labels. Bushman argues that information labels may be more effective than warning labels: Although we may want to know what we are eating, we don't want some authority figure telling us not to eat it. 

Overview | Article Summary | For Instructors | For Students

For Instructors

Links to the Lecture

At this point in the course, students tend to get lost in the details of contrived laboratory experiments and lose sight of how psychology can inform us about everyday behavior. This article can be used as a lead-in to a discussion of how psychological theory and methods are applied to understanding everyday human behavior. Bring up examples of local psychologists working in applied settings, such as consumer protection agencies, personnel departments, and local industry. 
Overview | Article Summary | For Instructors | For Students

For Students

About the Author

Brad Bushman is a social psychologist at Iowa State University. He has found similar effects using television warnings: The stronger the warning, the more people want to watch the show. 

About the Journal

The Journal of Applied Psychology publishes empirical articles that deal with applied issues, such as consumer affairs, work performance and satisfaction, and community affairs. 

Links to Life

  • What IS a good label? 
An English professor at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Dr. Bethany Dumas, has also found that people ignore warning labels. She has developed guidelines for writing warning labels. 
  • Pay Attention to those Warnings! 
Sometimes deadly serious warning labels are hilariously funny. Here is a list of humorous - but true - warning labels. Check out this site to read warning labels designed by physicists. 
  • Reading About Food Giving You The Munchies? 
Download this interactive shareware, Munchies: How to eat well on a student budget, to get the straight facts on nutrition. 
Share your latest research in our Discussion Forum 

 
Brooks/Cole Tree  ©1998 Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. All Rights Reserved.  
Use of this site indicates acceptance of the Terms and Conditions of Use 
Last updated April 12 1998
International Thomson Publishing