Chapter 10
Stimulus Control
- Relationship between antecedent stimulus and behaviours that follow it
- Generalization
- Discrimination
- Gradients
Measuring Generalization Gradients
- Train on one stimulus, test on others
- Tricky to test
- Reinforcement problem
- Extinction problem
- Successive discrimination task
Probe Trials
- Insert occasional unreinforced test stimulus
(Figure 1)
Extinction Blocks
- Train stimulus to asymptote
- Blocks of extinction trials
- Each stimulus presented once/block
- Extinction constant across stimuli
(Figure 2)
Generalization Gradient
(Figure 3)
Cause of Generalization Gradient?
- Pavlov
- Inherent property of nervous system
- Innate
- Lashley and Wade (1946)
- Explicit discrimination training required
- Learned
How Experience Affects the Generalization Gradient
- Nondifferential training
- Presence-absence training
- Two kinds of trials
- Reinforced and non-reinforced
- Discrimination
Intradimensional Training
- Discrimination training
- S+ and S- from same stimulus continuum
- Produces more focused generalization gradient
(Figure 4)
Absolute or Relative Stimulus Control?
- Stimulus discrimination
- Absolute theory:
- Relational theory:
- Learn relationship between stimuli
Example
(Figure 5)
Transposition
- Transfer relational rule to new stimuli set
- Kohler (1939)
(Figure 6)
Absolute vs. Relational Theories
- Absolute theories
- Successive discrimination tasks
- Relational theories
- Simultaneous discrimination tasks
- Animals do whatever is easiest
Peak Shift
- Change in generalization gradient
- Peak level of responding
- 1. Shift in peak level of responding away from S+ in direction opposite S-
- 2. The closer S+ and S-, the greater the difference in responding at peak and S+
(Figures 7 and 8)
- Both shift left
- Differences in responding at peak and S+
Spences Theory of Peak Shift
- Opponent process theory
- Excitatory and inhibitory gradients
- S+: excitatory
- S-: inhibitory
- Net sum
Peak Shift: Shift Away
(Figure 9)
Role of S-
(Figure 10)
Support for Spences Theory?
- Honig et al. (1963)
- Excitatory and inhibitory gradients
(Figure 11)
Behavioural Contrast
- Reinforcement contingencies for one stimulus can affect response to other stimuli
- Positive
- Responding increases to unchanged stimulus
- Negative
- Responding decreases to unchanged stimulus
Gutman (1977)
- Rats, multiple schedule
- Positive contrast
(Figure 12)
Errorless Discrimination
- To develop discrimination between S+ and S-
- Goals
- Respond strongly to S+
- Respond very little/not at all to S-
- Strong stimulus control in minimum time
- Factors
- Introduce S- early
- Fading
- e.g., Initially, S- shown very briefly; gradually lengthen exposure
Advantages of Errorless Discrimination
- Decreases overall responding to S-
- Improves long-term discrimination
- Less
- Aggressive/frustration behaviour when S- presented
- Behavioural contrast
- Peak shift
Concept Formation
- Stimuli from natural environment
- Train/test many stimuli
- Positive and negative instances
Natural Categories
- Classification of stimuli into groups
- Central and peripheral characteristics
- Gradated scale of belongingness
- Herrnstein (1979)
- Pigeons, 80 pictures
- Tree/no tree = positive/negative instances
- Learn discrimination easily
- Generalization test
- Supports concept formation, not memorization