Chapter 6 Brief Text Outline
Chapter 6
Law of Effect
- Thorndikes experiments
- Puzzle box
- Escape latency
- Discrete trial procedure
Law of Effect
- Operant: any behaviour that operates on the environment to produce an effect
- Reinforcer: any event that increases the frequency of a behaviour
Law of Effect
- Any behaviour followed by an appetitive stimulus will increase in frequency
Mechanical Strengthening Process
- Guthrie & Horton (1946)
- Cat in a box with pole
- Stereotypic behaviours
Stop-Action Principle
- Occurrence of reinforcer
- Strengthening of association
- Not immediate
- Dominance of one operant
Problems with Stop-Action Principle
- Muezingers (1928) guinea pigs
- Lever press for lettuce
- Not one dominant operant behaviour
(Figures 1-3)
Response Classes
- Reinforcement strengthens class of operant responses
- End goal
- Lashley (1942)
Superstitious Behaviour
- Skinner (1948)
- Pigeons
- Grain every 15 seconds
- Development of behaviours
- Accidental strengthening
Superstitions in Humans
- Rituals
- Personal and societal superstitions
- Persistent
Timing?
- Staddon & Simmelhag (1971)
- Interim and terminal behaviours
Shaping, or Successive Approximations
- Conditioned reinforcer
- Previously neutral stimulus that has acquired the capacity to strengthen responses because it has been repeatedly paired with a primary reinforcer
- Primary reinforcer
- Stimulus that naturally strengthens any response that is paired with it
Shaping a Lever Press
- Gradual process
- Reinforce more appropriate/precise responses
Versatility of Shaping Process
- Classical conditioning
- Law of Effect
- Shaping
Skinnerian Research
- B.F. Skinner
- Operant (instrumental) conditioning
- Operant: animal operates on environment
- Instrumental: animal instrumental in obtaining reinforcer
(Figure 4)
Free Operant
- Operant response can occur at any time
- Operant response can occur repeatedly
- Response rate
Ethologists vs. Skinnerians
- Criticisms
- Not natural environment, artificial behaviours, non-evolutionary constraints
- Defenses
- High experimental control, eliminates confounding variables, general principles seen across species, behaviours, and reinforcers
Successes of Skinnerian Methodology
- Cross-species similarities
- Parallels between lab and real-world
- Applications of lab results to real-world situations
Three-Term Contingency
- Contingency: Y iff X
- 1. Context in which response occurs (discriminative stimulus)
- 2. Response
- 3. Consequence
Discriminative Stimulus
- Consequence occurs if and only if operant response occurs
- Sets the occasion
Other Basic Principles
- Acquisition
- Extinction
- Spontaneous recovery
- Generalization
- Conditioned reinforcement
- Generalized reinforcers
Response Chains
- Reaction chains
- Sequences of behaviours in specific order
- Objective: primary reinforcer
- Conditioned reinforcers
- Discriminative stimuli
Backwards Chaining
- Often used with "complex" training
- Start with last response in chain
- Next, second last response
- Third last, etc.
Forward Chaining
- Start with first response in sequence, then work through to last response in additive steps
Total Task Method
- Only works with humans
- Go through entire sequence
- Verbal feedback at each step in sequence
Biological Constraints on Operant Conditioning
Instinctive Drift
- Breland & Breland (1961)
- Pig, raccoon
- Operant task
- Reinforcer
- Early in training
- Later in training
(Figure 5)
Autoshaping
- Brown & Jenkins (1968)
- Key pecking with pigeons
- VI-60 grain delivery
- Light on 8 seconds before food delivery
- No response necessary
- But pigeons started pecking light
- Automaintenance
- Why peck at all?
Is it: Superstitious Behaviour?
- Series of unintentionally shaped responses
- No evidence supporting this
- Rachlin (1969)
- Williams & Williams (1969)
Is it: Classical Conditioning?
- US = grain, UR = pecking
- Transfer UR from grain to key
- Successful when light predictive of food, not otherwise
- Jenkins & Moore (1975)
- Grain or water
- Different beak position
- Stimulus substitution
- Peterson, Ackil, Frommer, & Hearst (1972)
- Rats
- Lever press ---> food or electrical stimulation of brain
- Food: gnaw/lick
- ESB: stroke/groom
Is it: Instinctive Behaviour Patterns?
- Wasserman (1973)
- Chicks, key light, heat lamp
- "Snuggle" key vs. motionless wing spread to lamp
- Physical properties of signal determine response form
- Timberlake & Grant (1975)
- Rat signals delivery of food to second rat
- Social, not food response
- Behaviour-system analysis
General-Principle Approach
- Reinforcement not sole determinant of behaviour
- Phylogenetic and learning influences
URL: www.psych.ualberta.ca/~msnyder/p281/notes/out06.html
Page created: 28 Feb. 2003 --- Last modified: 28 Feb. 2003